Skip to main content

Mayawati’s deftness in bringing diverse social groups together has triumphed. She needs to replicate social engineering in economic development

Mayawati’s sweeping victory in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections was a vindication of the fact that all is not yet lost of the cause of India. The nation’s largest and perhaps one of the worst ruled state is finally out of the clutches of mafia rule and is probably heading towards a new dawn of equitable social and economic development. Mayawati’s victory is not only significant that a Dalit woman has once again been given the mantle of the largest state, but is also the reflection of the changing dynamics of India’s socio-political milieu. Her sweeping victory is one of the biggest of Indian democracy, by all parameters.

Probably for the first time in the history of modern India, people cut across caste lines and came together to vote for a woman who is known to be a hard task master and accepts no nonsense. Two years ago, when the people of Bihar dethroned Lalu Prasad and rejected his caste-based divisive politics and reinstated Nitish Kumar, they had shown the path. Despite this, Mulayam Singh Yadav and his right hand Amar Singh missed the writing on the wall. In the last nearly four years of Mulayam’s rule, he has shown the extent that criminalisation of politics and crony capitalism can go. While party members like Mukhtar Ansari, Atiq Ahmed and Raja Bhaiya ran their fiefdoms untrammeled like autocratic rulers and engineered arson of their own accord, Mulayam preferred to look the other way. Kidnappings, contract killings, rape and the hard to forget Nithari like incidents were becoming more of a norm, rather than an exception. Not only that, development was restricted to Noida, Ghaziabad and his village of Saifai (which is more like a five star resort than a village), while the rest of the state reeled under acute shortage of power, employment, road connectivity and peace. No one knows how much money has been siphoned in the last nearly four years. It is no secret that Mulayam’s version of industrialisation was all about doling out favours to his friends whose names are too well known to merit a mention. Mulayam let the situation drift in this manner because he was sure that the Muslim-Yadav vote bank would see him through, come what may.

Eventually, hope for good governance had to win over identity politics. Incidentally, people voted for the Dalit woman because they wanted to at least be safe in their homes. Uttar Pradesh has been one of the last bastions of identity politics, where caste matters to such an extent that every other factor takes a back seat. This election gave that “reality” a burial. Mayawati’s victory is also historical for the fact that after a long time, one party crossed the simple majority mark on its own without the crutches of other parties.

This is no mean achievement knowing that in the recent past, Uttar Pradesh has been infamous for the fractured mandates, giving rise to rampant horse trading and unabashed politicking. Previously, whoever was running the government was very dependent on these smaller parties or breakaway factions for survival, that governance and development was the last thing in their mind. What always took precedence was the survival of the government and for that they would go to any extent to appease these small time MLAs, who were like kingmakers threatening to topple a government any moment.

Another reason which needs to be mentioned is that the communal politics of BJP and identity politics of Samajwadi Party have been given a thumbs down by the electorate, a similar thumbs down has also been given to the Congress. Rahul Gandhi campaigned extensively, which was a dress rehearsal before the 2009 general elections and proved that he has a long way to go. The voters too did not fall for any of the rhetoric. What they wanted was stability, peace and progress and they voted for that. Mayawati’s biggest achievement is her social engineering, whereby she brought the upper castes, scheduled castes, other backward classes and Muslims together and thus heralded the beginning of a new India. Her victory has been a true victory of India’s identity of being a secular nation.

So where do we go from here? Now that half the job is done, the bigger test awaits Mayawati. She has to deliver on the trust that people have reposed in her and usher in development along with peace. At the same time, she has to make sure that the type of crony capitalism the previous government encouraged should be completely dismantled. She should not go in for a witch hunt and not rollback all the projects that were started by the previous governmment, because that would only hurt the interest of Uttar Pradesh. The manner in which she has successfully managed to coalesce all castes and communities, she needs to replicate similar success in engineering the socio-economic initiatives and herald the beginning of a new India. She has worked hard to achieve this and now is her opportunity to prove her mettle not only to the citizens of Uttar Pradesh, but the entire country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichés and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichés from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not