Skip to main content

The compulsions of a coalition would exist, but we need to still productively engage in positive political pluralism and set an example for the world!

A few days back, at the fourth International Conference on Federalism, the Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, voiced his concerns over the dangers posed by narrow political interests (on account of regional politics) that are coming in the way of the larger national interest. No doubt, our honourable Prime Minister has learnt the harsh realities of coalition politics the hard way, which was evident from his speech. In fact, a classic metaphor of such coalition compulsions was evident in the manner the Centre has been handling the Nandigram issue. The Centre’s stance amply vindicates its sheer helplessness on account of its dependence on CPI(M). All that the Centre did was to send one battalion of CRPF from Dhanbad...And that’s it! As the CPI(M) cadres continued with their victory procession and made sure that the entire Nandigram was reconverted into a red bastion, the CRPF contingent was kept strangled at Tamluk. The reason why something like this happened is no secret, as it is all based on the compulsions of sustaining the Fahrenheit figure of 272 at Lok Sabha. And this has been going on for long. It is the same reason why Karunanidhi can say anything about Lord Ram and get away with it. It is the same reason due to which special efforts are made to keep criminal politicians (for records, almost one fourth of our MPs are facing charges of corruption, arson, murder and even rape!) in good humour; and it is for the same reason because of which the Congress, though reluctantly, had to keep aside the Indo-US nuclear deal.

From the nineties onwards, the regional parties have started playing a more dominant role in national politics, as the top national parties like Congress and BJP started receiving fractured mandates. While the representation of Congress in the Parliament has been on a decline, the mandate for BJP has never reached a level from where it could make a government on its own. Most of the regional parties, whose ascension has been on the basis of an anti-Congress stance, realised that their regional interests can be served best only if they have a stake in the Central government. Even though initially many of them were belligerent towards BJP for its communal tag, eventually many of the regional parties realised that their long term interests can only be served better by shedding their inhibitions towards BJP. More so, it made sense for the BJP to join hands with the regional parties and form some kind of alliance, as more often than not, BJP has been mostly restricted to the Hindi speaking belt of India with virtually nil or a marginal presence in the rest of the country.

The tactic of arm twisting was initially started by Telugu Desam, which attempted at that time what the CPI(M) is doing now, i.e. power without responsibility. It was during the NDA regime that Hyderabad reached its zenith as the new Silicon hub of India. Almost every dignitary who came to India was made to pay a visit to the state capital, Hyderabad. Most of the ministries were in hurry to expedite the clearance of any big ticket project which was meant for Andhra Pradesh. Perhaps such was the order from the PMO. This line of approach was later picked up by DMK, which, though being ideologically much opposed to the BJP, found it convenient to keep aside the Dravidian politics and work in tandem with BJP in the NDA in their quest to make Tamil Nadu a major manufacturing as well as an IT hub of India. Soon, many big ticket automobile giants were headed for Chennai. The Biju Janata Dal of Orissa led by Naveen Pattnaik and even Farooq Abdullah of Jammu & Kashmir did the same thing in their own ways.

While the regional parties started becoming popular names even beyond their regions, and while they started dreaming of spreading out their wings, what they did not groom in the meantime was a national vision. None of them had or have a clear cut vision on foreign policy, defence policy, trade policy, or for that matter any policy, as these were never required for running a state. This attitude was reflected even in their fight against internal security issues as they were satisfied enough to make their own state secure. The rest of India was never important.

In the given scenario Dr. Singh’s outburst wasn’t wrong, but then we also need to realise that coalition governments are here to stay. And a single party coming to power is neither a possibility nor a solution as history has been witness to the fact that a single party in power tends to get dictatorial. So, acknowledging the fact that compulsions of a coalition would exist as it is an extension of myriad aspirations emanating from diverse communities, we need to still productively engage in positive political pluralism and set an example for the world. It is indeed challenging but then if we lose it now, needless to say, we lose it forever!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichés and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichés from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not