Skip to main content

Most dehumanising budget ever delivered in the history of independent India!!

No doubt, year after year the Union Budget ritual is a big let down. But then, this year’s Budget has surpassed all such milestones created by previous Budgets in letting down the masses of this country. It was amazing to watch how casually and callously our honourable Finance Minister (FM) kept on doling out favours after favours, with the least respect for a citizen’s money. It was also amazing to note how our sitting MPs, dead drunk in ‘populism’, kept on vehemently applauding each and every illogical and irrational announcement made by the FM. The final icing came towards the end of his speech, when mainstream media, industrial associations and industrial big wigs shamelessly sang in unison in appreciation for the FM, without getting into the details of the actual impending effects of some of the reckless decisions taken by him, in his Budget speech.

Let’s start with our Honourable FM’s biggest kill in this year’s Budget – Waiving of a staggering Rs 60,000 crores worth of loans of farmers. This waiver has actually catapulted him to a ‘messiah of farmers,’ who seems to be desperately trying to sensitise and uplift the downtrodden farmers from misery!! But then the truth is far from reality! What I fail to understand is that for a FM who is reading his seventh Budget, isn’t he aware that this waiver in reality would not serve any of its purpose? Isn’t he aware of the fact that more than 50% of the farmer families are in debt trap, and of these, around 50% are those farmer families who are victims of vicious debt traps laid down by the private money lenders? Is he completely ignorant of the fact that it is these farmer families who are most prone to suicides and that such a waiver would not be of any help as these private lenders do not fall under the purview of RBI? For any FM not to know all this is definitely not possible. And if it is so, then the question is, why such a waiver when it does not help the needy? And who does this waiver actually help? Well, answers to both these questions are actually the same. The waiver invariably helps only those farmers (relatively more well-to-do) who, first of all, have the means of getting a loan from a bank. More importantly, it is also a fact that (much unlike the way our FM feels) not every other farmer in India is in distress, as the rich farmers of Punjab, Haryana and Western UP are also some of the largest buyers of the luxury cars in India. By giving a blanket waiver, all that the FM has done is to pamper the relatively well-off farmers and encouraged the borrowers to waste money on conspicuous consumption and leaving the state of the distressed lot as it is.

The truth is that the problem of the farm sector simply cannot be done away with just a one time loan waiver. And this is something which our honourable FM also knows, but then looking at the way he has still gone ahead with the waiver, leaves no doubt that it was a populist step intended to fetch votes for the incumbent government in the ensuing Union elections! Had the FM any intention of actually helping the distressed, then instead of waiving this loan, he should have deferred it, and should have mobilised the same for further capital investments and employment generation schemes in rural India, especially in the distress prone areas. Or for that matter, even if the FM would have decided to distribute this sum through a monthly scheme to all the distressed rural families, it would have been still better than the waiver, as then it would have fetched even better results towards humanising the budget exercise.

His next big kill was the unwarranted tax exemptions for the working class. ‘Unwarranted’, I say, because these exemptions (except for the one granted for senior citizens) again do not help those who need them the most. As such, there are almost 70% (including the 40% below the poverty line) of the Indian population who do not fall under the tax bracket, and even for those who fall under it, only 2% of them actually pay taxes, so the effective benefit accrues to only 2% of the population, which is the typical Indian middle class. Any which way, this middle class has always been self centered and has been pampered by the government for long through various subsidies and other forms of benefits, so instead of giving them any further, the FM should have mobilised the same money for the benefits of the underprivileged, for it would then have actually universalised the benefits of the Budget exercise.

In fact, the downside of the entire Budget had been so severe that it has completely offset the only upside of it. And that is his initiative of including all the 600 districts under the NREGA. No doubt, this is the right step towards productively engaging the underprivileged, provided it succeeds in corruption-free implementation, which in itself remains a daunting challenge. Also, other than this, the FM has increased the budget allocations for health and education by 15% to 20% respectively, but then it still does not come anywhere close to what the government should actually spend. In fact, if the revenues have grown on the income side, the least that was expected was a proportional increase in allocation in the priority social sector spending, which again did not happen.

All in all, with disproportionate and undue privileges to the already privileged, and that too, with the sole objective of gaining political mileage, the Union Budget 2008/09 would go down in the pages of history as the most de-humanising budget ever delivered!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichés and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichés from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not