Skip to main content

While China is driving the African Safari, India is yet to board it!!!

The world might not subscribe to China and its policies for many reasons but they definitely are worthy of credit for their amazing farsightedness. They have proved this time and again and are all set to prove it again. In the given scenario wherein crude oil prices are showing no sign of respite, each and every government is untiringly trying to secure themselves with respect to their ever growing energy demands, it is as if the Chinese had thought of this imminent energy crunch a long time back and had started planning accordingly. In fact, the way they are going about it is also worthy to note. Particularly over the last one decade, the world has been witnessing that a country, which has never bothered to look beyond its immediate neighbourhood was suddenly becoming very keen about Africa. Billions of dollars from China have been poured into countries, which otherwise have been a pariah for global investment. It is being reported that China’s trade with Africa has been growing at almost 40% since 2001. By 2006, the trade between China and Africa had already reached the magic figure of $50 billion. In effect, China has become the third largest trading partner of Africa after the United States and the European Union. To an extent, China has been able to productively engage even with Sudan, which otherwise had been reeling under a humanitarian crisis and a relentless civil war!! And all this, China had been doing with an underlying objective, to secure their energy demands. There is no secret in this, as one close analysis of Africa’s exports to China clarifies everything. According to an IMF report – In 2006, oil and gas accounted for over 60% of Africa’s exports to China, followed by non-petroleum minerals and metals at 13%. The report also states that Africa’s imports from China comprised mainly manufactured products and machinery and transport equipment, which together accounted for about three-fourths of total imports.

This probably explains it all, and even the reason of China’s trade with Sudan, as after Nigeria, Sudan has one of the largest reserves of oil in Africa! But this trade has immensely helped even African nations, as in many of the African countries, along with the Chinese investments for manufacturing that is pouring in, China is putting effort to invest in the social and physical infrastructure of the oil rich countries in terms of setting up roads, hospitals, schools, and telecom facilities. For a beleaguered Africa, used to destruction through civil war, this trading relation has come as nothing less than a blessing. In the short run, nothing could have been a more win-win situation for both involved and especially for Africa. While the world continues to debate as to how ethical the Chinese investments in Africa are, and while India continues to ponder as to whether it should follow the path of China or continue with its own set of conflicting foreign policy; China quietly makes major inroads in Africa to make it as its next destination of manufacturing. In counties like Sierra Leone, Zambia, Liberia, Mozambique, Nigeria and Angola, China is setting up industrial zones. For not only Africa offers the right kind of market in terms of low cost Chinese products, it also offers very low cost labour for manufacturing.

Yet, it is not always so straightforward whenever China is involved. There are allegations that China has been pumping in millions of dollars worth small arms into Africa, especially in Sudan to fuel the ongoing civil war in lieu of oil. Whatever the case might be, Africans don’t seem to be too uncomfortable with a Chinese presence.

Contrast this with India. We’re a country having more historical connections with Africa than perhaps any other country. And probably, no other country has ever perhaps thought about the plight of Africa so selflessly as India. Yet, when it comes to give a logical direction to this emotional attachment for mutual benefit, India continues to lag behind and seems to be bereft of any direction. More unfortunate than this is the fact that India seems to have a reactionary approach with respect to Africa than a proactive one. Its approach is not because of its own urge, but seems more as following the footsteps of China (the recent overture in terms of Indo-African summit included). And while the leaders of more than a dozen African countries pledged their solidarity with India, they also know that many of the intended Indian investments would eventually get mired in red tape much unlike the way China does. When seen in retrospect, no other country has more leverage than India in Africa, given the huge population of Indian origin that one finds in abundance in Africa. In certain countries like Mauritius or South Africa, Kenya or Uganda, the Indian diaspora is the most prominent, richest and influential community of the country. Still, India – typically known for its proverbial habit of missing the bus – has failed to take mileage out of it. The Indo-African trade continues to be half of what China has with Africa.

Irrespective of the allegations that China faces, it is certain that it is doing a far better job than even donor agencies. For the world knows that Africans are fed up with debt assistance and subsequent debt traps and are now looking for jobs and better quality affordable products complemented with a relatively better lifestyle. And this is a latent African opportunity that China has been able to engage with quite successfully!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichés and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichés from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not