Skip to main content

It is indeed commendable that we have successfully hit space; but then, there is a lot that needs to be done on the ground!!!

Indian Space Research Organisation’s Chandrayaan-1 has sculpted history by making India only the sixth nation in the history of mankind to send an unmanned mission to the moon. No doubt, this feat is commendable for India not just because the launch follows immediately after India has positioned itself as a de-facto nuclear power (post signing of the Indo-US Nuclear deal), but it also follows immediately after a Chinese taikonaut (astronaut) set his foot in space. Moreover, as per reports, this successful launch would not only help India to look out for Helium 3 (an integral source for nuclear energy), but also can create a possible revenue stream in the future. But above all, the biggest achievement is that India could successfully attain all this at a relatively lesser cost than that of China (that is, if media reports are to be believed).

Although there are umpteen reasons to celebrate this remarkable technological feat, what has followed immediately after the successful launch was the usual rhetoric of how India is inching towards China. Evidently, the China-complex has grown out of proportion within our political leadership. No doubt, any kind of such competitive syndrome is always healthy, but what is ironical is that such a syndrome surfaces within our leadership quite selectively. It is needless to state that by launching a Chandrayaan-1, India might have come closer to China in terms of the space-race, but when it comes to having the urge and the need to match China in terms of socio-economic indicators, neither is India anywhere near the behemoth, nor does there seem to be any hurry on the part of Indian policymakers to try to catch up. For argument’s sake, one look at the medals tally at the recently held Beijing Olympics – where China won 51 golds, the highest by any country; and a total of 100 medals, second highest after America – clearly indicates the number of years it would take us to even try and get close to China (that is, if at all we ever get close, considering our one gold medal and two bronze medals).

That’s just one part. Even otherwise, the brilliantly structured manner in which China has gone about its economic development ensures that it would take decades for us to catch up with her. Even today, China makes it a point to make health and education as national priorities, which the government makes available for all. For something like that to become a reality and effectively operational in India would be an achievement no lesser than the very launch of the Chandrayaan-1 in space. But then, as I said before, our political leadership conveniently suffers from a pretty selective Chinese syndrome!

On another front – though there isn’t any direct correlation with this successful launch per se – one more important aspect is that in our case, there remains a lack of integration of technological achievement and socio-economic development. One might wonder why efforts are not being made to merge science with the basic needs of mankind. In India, just like in economics, we have not been able to bring science out of the rooms of abstract discussions and marry that with the dire needs of the masses.

The world is full of examples of how economies have successfully gone about judiciously using technology for uplifting the society as a whole. Take the case of Information Technology! Agreed, that this sector has been instrumental in generating huge employment opportunities and also has helped us earn valuable foreign exchange. IT had the potential to change the face of this country in terms of governance and delivery mechanisms. But then, for all the success that India garnered in this field (and having the honour of being called the IT hub of the world), such would have been the case, provided intentions had been sincere enough to employ IT judiciously towards public governance and delivery mechanisms.

The same holds true with respect to technological advancements in the field of pharmaceuticals. While the expertise in generic drugs has been followed by strides in molecular research, human genome research and new drug delivery systems, it is unfortunate that getting decent and affordable treatment in India still remains a distant dream. Forget getting the expensive anti-retroviral drug therapy for HIV treatment, even basic drugs are out of reach.

In the given context, the technological feat that we have attained by the launch of Chadrayaan-1 looks more of a tokenism, which builds nothing else but shallow prestige. But for a nation like ours, which is marred with solvable problems, all such feats and comparisons become meaningless till the time they directly connect to the socio-economic development of the masses. Till we realise this, I have only one message for the political leadership – it is indeed commendable that we have successfully hit space; but then, there is a lot that needs to be done on the ground!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichĂ©s and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichĂ©s from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not