Skip to main content

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM OR WORLD HYPOCRITES FORUM!

What do you do when you don’t have solutions to the most pertinent problems devastating the world? Well, you just form a forum of like minded, power hungry and ayesayers, find an exotic resort in Europe and discuss the problems for a few days in the most obscenely luxurious environs and pledge to meet next year again with some new issues to discuss, albeit without any substantial solutions. This is the best way to define a forum most ceremoniously called the ‘World Economic Forum’. From which viewpoint it is a ‘world’ forum, is hard to comprehend. It can be termed a world forum if and only if the world is just about the US and Europe. And since it is not, the World Economic Forum (WEF) is in no way a global forum.

So what is it? Well, to begin with, the World Economic Forum is a private entity and not essentially one, which is necessarily represented by all the nation states. Initiated by Professor Klaus M. Schwab (who has been famous for equating the anti globalisation protesters with terrorists), the World Economic Forum has been a forum where companies are invited based on their annual revenues. No wonder, if this is the criteria, then no one can expect any company from under-developed economies to have a fair chance to put forward their view points and problems, forget expecting any substantial solution in return. While the WEF has been crying aloud that it is the ideal platform to discuss pertinent issues plaguing the world, one wonders how does the coming together of the perpetrators themselves solve the problems of AIDS in Asia and Africa, sectarian violence in Iraq and Pakistan, ethnic violence in Sri Lanka, and ripples created by the onslaught of globalisation. Well, one could have still been hopeful of some concrete ideas coming out of it had some prominent organisations, research institutions, think tanks and economists been part of it. But certainly, you don’t expect much when the CEOs of aerated drinks, beverages and chocolate companies come together for a rendezvous. Add to this the millions of dollars wasted on this useless annual event for the so called ‘fool proof’ security from not just terrorists, but also the people who come their to voice concerns through protests and resentments. It is not only that the voices of resentment are gagged, but considering them as threat, a curfew like situation is created to keep the protesters at arms length; while the men who have congregated there, at their hypocritical best, pretend to talk about these very people and their plight.

To gauge the scope and depth of the hypocrisy, let’s have a look at one of the theme issues of the forum this year. It’s been named ‘the shifting power equation’, which essentially is all about the emergence of India and China. To realise this ‘global secret’, the organisers have spent millions of dollars, in one of most expensive locales of the world, with a war-time like security arrangements (Frankly, it’s quite clear that neither India nor China was waiting for the WEF endorsement; the ascent of these countries is not because of WEF, but because of the sheer perseverance, dedication, determination and sacrifice of their millions of middle class employees and entrepreneurs). It was also interesting to note that they did feel it pertinent to discuss about the burning Middle East. But even when the entire world knows how the idiosyncrasies of one dim-witted individual destroyed and disintegrated one entire country forever, no one in WEF found it significant enough to take up this issue or to, even for the sake of lip-service, conclude with a solemn pledge that such a thing should not be repeated again anywhere in the world. Understandably though, as the entire conclave is at the mercy of the American multinationals – and their sponsor money – along with American senators, who form the bulk of the heavyweights representing the forum. Trade, globalisation, aid, petro-politics, climate change, were among the other ‘prominent pertinent’ issues that were discussed at the forum with the usual barrage of hollow rhetoric.

What more, the mother of all hypocrisy, the home page of the World Economic Forum states – The World Economic Forum is a ‘truly independent international organisation committed to improving the state of the world by engaging leaders in partnerships to shape global, regional and industry agendas’. The fact is, even if they would have pledged just half of the forum’s income (which runs into millions of dollars) to a miniscule proportion of the billion plus people who don’t have access to safe drinking water and sanitation, it would have made the existence of the forum more meaningful. In fact, to live up to their deeds (defying Shakespeare), the forum should immediately re-christen themselves as World Hypocrites Forum, as there is a lot in a name!!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichĂ©s and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichĂ©s from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not