Skip to main content

From aboriginals to tribalism: Why India needs to clean up its house before accusing others

Right at the start, let me take up the example of Canada, which is celebrating the 250th anniversary of The Royal Proclamation of 1763, issued by King George III – a landmark document which is considered by Canada’s aboriginal leaders as the bedrock of their rights. Shawn Atleo, national chief of the Assembly of First Nations (a body of leaders of First Nations in Canada, which aims to protect the rights of aboriginals in Canada) said on this occasion, “We need a robust agenda of change. Now is the era of action… We set out the priorities that will lift us up and carry the country forward.”

While reading this, I got thinking about the dismal picture of our very own aboriginals – or should I say tribals – as the term “aboriginals” is not used in the Indian context. The tribes living in India can be traced back to the primitive times, satisfying the similar condition of genesis, as has been the case in Australia, Canada and United States. Tribal communities in India make up 8 per cent of our population, and are mostly concentrated in central and eastern parts of India, in the states of Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Odisha and West Bengal. But such an expansive presence is of not much significance as tribes and tribal communities in India have been kept historically marginalised and deliberately disadvantaged. The marginalisation of Indian tribal communities has taken place not only in the economic and social spheres, but also in the cultural arena. Like European settlers, we also discriminated them on the basis of their culture, beliefs, customs and values. They were and are never accepted in the mainstream of our society. What to say of that, even the Indianness of their culture and heritage is questioned.

For centuries, the ‘superior’ connotation attached with the ‘upper’ echelons (whatever that means) of the Indian society bred discrimination, marginalisation and despicable persecution of the tribal groups – in some cases, historical and religious texts are forwarded as justification for such persecution. I am sure you must have read some or the other of our mythological scriptures depicting the tribal clan as some kind of a bad omen to the non-tribal. If that’s not discrimination, then what is? We keep harping about racism and subjugation of the disadvantaged by Western nations. Are we any different than these Western nations in our treatment to the adivasis? What is more disturbing is that despite an equitable Constitution giving equal rights and privilege to all citizens, the intolerance for adivasis in our society is abound. It is not that successive Indian governments didn’t take measures for redemption (led by the example that Mahatma Gandhi set while preaching equality of classes), but the genuineness in applicability of these measures is still far from being desired.

Read more

Comments

Unknown said…
It is really said that any government which runds the state has the same approach towards the adivasis, which has resulted in the repeated denials of their basic rights.

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichés and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichés from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not