Skip to main content

A world free of Poverty?

A world free of Poverty?

Birthday Wishes for Bill Gates - one of the greatest humanists alive... a man who dares to dream of a world free of poverty!

Today is Bill Gates' birthday! And this is how I believe he is changing the lives of millions which we must all know and share...

A lot has been said about Steve Jobs. Indeed, he was a fighter and his success story has been most inspiring. His biography ‘The journey is the reward’, written years ago, inspired me personally to try and achieve more. And since Steve Jobs was the creative wild and hippie underdog during the same era as Gates, perhaps he overshadowed Gates largely during our times. Yet, I have always maintained that Bill Gates is the man who is the real visionary. Far beyond any businessman the world has seen in our times. For who is a greater business icon? The man who makes billions and keeps them as reserves or the man who makes billions and then uses that money to change the world into a better place to live in?

Yes, that’s what differentiates Bill Gates from all his contemporaries. Greatly inspired by the Rockefeller family, Bill Gates, in the year 2000, by combining three of his and his wife’s charities, decided to do what no one could ever imagine. He decided to give away 95% of his wealth to charity. As of today, he has given away more than 28 billion dollars in charity. In 2010, he along with Warren Buffett, inspired even Mark Zuckerberg to pledge away half of his wealth over his lifetime by making him sign the “Gates-Buffett Giving Pledge”. Yet, what really differentiates Bill Gates’ charitable initiatives from others is his clear-cut focus on the real and biggest problem that the world faces. Yes, the problem of poverty. The problem that 85 top, rich people own wealth that’s more than the total wealth of the poorest 3.5 billion. The problem that while the rich are rich like never before and while science has advanced humongously and soon humans may even dream of living forever, there are millions dying of curable diseases in Africa and other parts of the world. There is nothing fashionable in the work of Bill Gates. He doesn’t believe in having fashionable fights and dinners for animal rights etcetera while human beings live like street dogs and die like them. His is a clear cut and sharp focus on humanity. To be more precise, a focuse on the genuinely poorest of poor and unhealthiest of unhealthy (thus, obviously, a large part of his work happens in Africa).

Sometime back in Davos, Bill Gates raised too many eyebrows by making the statement that “There will be no poor nations in the world by 2035”. Gates and his wife tried to dispel three key myths. The first myth he busted was of poor countries staying poor. Gates gave China’s example of an 8-fold increase in real per capita income to prove that poor countries need not stay poor. The second myth he busted was of aid being labelled wasteful, solely because countries apparently become dependent on it or much of it gets stolen. Criticising USA’s less than 1% budget allocation to aid, he gave the example of Norway (which allocates more than 3% of its budget for aid) and showed how from measles to TB to polio, all diseases were being controlled and eliminated from Latin America, China and Africa thanks to foreign aid. And finally he dispelled the myth that saving lives would lead to over-population; he showed how countries with higher economic growth rates were the countries with higher birthrates. The fact of the matter is, his wife argued, “The planet does not thrive when the sickest are allowed to die off, but rather when they are able to improve their lives.”

All the above points are true, yet 2035 is far too near for poverty to disappear. Bill Gates’ hopes could be a bit too optimistic and his statement may not come true, but the fact is that as long as people like Gates are there in the world of capitalism, there is hope for humanity and poor. There is hope that poverty will indeed end.

I end by repeating something I have been speaking about for quite some time now... Next year, when the Nobel Peace Prize committee sits down to decide whom to award the prize to, it will do the world of hope, ethical business and humanity a great favour by making Bill Gates a much deserved Nobel laureate.

Cheers!


Know more about Arindam or get in touch with him: https://youtube.com/c/DrArindamChaudhuri www.Instagram.com/dr.ArindamChaudhuri https://m.imdb.com/name/nm1374768/ https://www.ft.com/content/57cb97bc-f3db-11da-9dab-0000779e2340?segmentid=acee4131-99c2-09d3-a635-873e61754ec6 https://elitedelhimagazine.wordpress.com/2018/10/21/the-mega-disruptor-and-godfather-of-private-education-in-india/ https://www.abillionleaders.com/media-feedback.html https://m.businesstoday.in/story/best-b-schools-iipm-arindam-chaudhuri/1/188870.html https://Facebook.com/dr.ArindamChaudhuri https://www.arindamchaudhuri.com/ https://www.abillionleaders.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HATS OFF TO SHAH RUKH KHAN FOR STANDING HIS GROUND! IT’S NOW TIME TO END THIS HOOLIGANISM ONCE AND FOR ALL AND MAKE MUMBAI A UNION TERRITORY!

SRK is great! Not just because he is such a star, but because he genuinely is the most amazing person and has such a logical and sound brain. And now the entire nation idolizes this man all the more because he has become a symbol of sheer courage as well! And I think all it required was someone like him to stand up coolly and say, “This is not right, I’ve done nothing wrong and I won’t apologise.” When he was saying this, one could almost see the schoolboy rebel in him – not ready to cow down to an illogical man trying to act as the school headmaster. I am writing this editorial immediately after coming back from a show on NDTV 24x7, which was on the topic, “Is Sena the real power in Mumbai?” I was one of the speakers. It was sad to see Uddhav Thackeray, who was another speaker in that show, sticking to a stance that cannot be defended by any sense of logic. When questioned on the show by the NDTV anchor on his tendentious comments against SRK, Uddhav’s reply was that one should ask th

It’s important for Anna to become more flexible and respectful towards the democratic process, to give a bigger thrust to his movement

I was too young then to really remember it all; but I have heard from many people that the mass protests generated by the arrest of Anna Hazare are similar to the uprising called Total Revolution led by the late Jaiprakash Narayan in the early 1970s. In fact, it was the Total Revolution and the chaos that followed – and a historic blunder by Indira Gandhi – that led to the imposition of the Emergency in India in 1975. Many people are comparing today’s situation to the Emergency days. The people of India are so fed up and so disgusted with corruption and our rotten and corrupt system that the wave of protests we see is hardly surprising. I have often publicly called India not a democracy but a demonocracy where crooked politicians and their criminal cohorts are openly plundering the nation; well aware that a dysfunctional judicial system will allow them to get away. In almost all cases, they have actually got away and have hence acquired the arrogance and swagger of pirates who know

Don’t see “Slumdog Millionaire”. It sucks!

A phony poseur that has been made only to mock India for the viewing pleasure of the First World!! The emperor’s new clothes! That’s “Slumdog Millionaire” for you… Five minutes into this celebrated patchwork of illogical clichés and you are struck by the jarring dialogues. The cumbersome delivery in a language which doesn’t come naturally to most of the actors sounds like someone scratching on walls with one’s finger nails; it ruins the possibility of a connection… Had this film been made by an Indian director, it would’ve been trashed as a rotting old hat, which literally stands out only because of its stench, but since the man making it happens to be from the West, we’re all left celebrating the emperor’s new clothes. The film borrows an undoubtedly interesting narrative style – from films like “City of God” – but then uses it to weave in a collection of clichés from the Third World’s underbelly for the viewing pleasure of a First World audience. The real slumdog in the movie is not